Brisc vs VIPR

Brisc vs VIPR: bordereaux both ways, then the cash.

Both platforms ingest and validate bordereaux. Brisc also generates the bordereau back out in the format the receiving party requires, and proves the reported premium against the money that actually arrived. Where Lloyd’s direct reporting is mandatory, VIPR is the right answer.

Two shapes

A platform, and an engine.

VIPR

Delegated authority platform

Six products across the DA value chain: coverholder onboarding, a submission portal, bordereaux management in Intrali, analytics and a data warehouse. Established in the Lloyd’s and London market, with a library of 150+ pre-built validation checks.

Brisc

Bordereaux management, through to the cash

The Bordereaux Analyst reads the layout each partner actually sends, validates it against the binder, and generates the bordereau in the format the receiving party requires. Then the reported premium is reconciled to the money at policy, layer or treaty level. Every match carries its evidence; every exception carries an explanation.

Where each stops

VIPR validates the bordereau. Brisc validates it, produces it, and reconciles it to cash.

VIPR stops at

A trusted data set. VIPR says Intrali validates, transforms and aggregates risk, premium and claims data into “a single, trusted data model”, and the rest of the platform (portal, onboarding, analytics, data warehouse) is built around that model. VIPR says it serves 50% of Lloyd’s managing agents and processes about 500,000 bordereaux a year, and in October 2026 announced a US office to add to its Hartford presence. It is built for the managing agent or carrier that wants the whole delegated authority workflow from one vendor with a Lloyd’s pedigree.

Brisc goes on to

The cash. The same validation of the file, then the bordereau generated in the format the receiver requires, then every reported premium and claim matched to the bank and remittance lines that settled it, and the result posted back to your policy administration system or ledger with the evidence attached. Brisc is built for the carrier, MGA or reinsurer whose question is not only “is this file right?” but “did the money arrive?”.

VIPR facts from viprsolutions.com, the Intrali product page and The Insurer, 19 October 2026, read 20 October 2026. How the layers fit together: bordereaux management, who does what. VIPR sits in carrier-side validation (layer B); Brisc works in that layer, in MGA-side production (layer A), and in cash-to-bordereaux reconciliation (layer E).

Side by side

Same job on bordereaux. Different method.

 VIPRBrisc
Layer Bordereaux data: ingestion, validation, standardisation, reporting, inside a delegated authority platform Bordereaux data and cash: validation, generation, then reconciliation of the file to the bank, posted back to your system of record
Built for Lloyd’s managing agents, carriers, brokers and coverholders wanting the full delegated authority workflow Carriers, MGAs and reinsurers who need the file proved and the premium on it proved against cash
Deployment shape A multi-product platform with its own data warehouse, implemented per customer SaaS on Azure, one dedicated tenant per customer; day one needs no PAS integration
Formats in Excel, Word and PDF Excel, CSV, PDF, settlement documents, ACORD-style files, and broker emails forwarded straight to the Analyst
A new layout Configured per customer, mapped as part of implementation Auto-suggested on the first file, confirmed once by your operations team, then reused every month. No engineering ticket
Validation A mature library of 150+ pre-built checks Cross-version diff, financial footing, commission and brokerage against the binder, duplicates, disappearing rows, plus rules configured per program
Bordereaux out Validated, standardised bordereaux data and reports The bordereau itself, generated in the format the receiving party requires, plus the premium bordereau you owe capacity, built from matched cash
Explainability Rules-based validation output Every extracted value carries a reasoning paragraph naming the source document and how it was read; every match names the rule that made it
Where data lives Reconciliation runs against the VIPR Data Cloud Your systems. Output posts back to your PAS, general ledger or data lake; Brisc is not a second ledger to keep in sync
Cash matching Outside Intrali’s scope The core of the Reconciliation Analyst: reported premium matched to the bank, with evidence
Lloyd’s reporting Established in the Lloyd’s and London market Generates and validates the bordereau in the layout your managing agent requires, including the Lloyd’s Coverholder Reporting Standards v5.2 file. Not a Lloyd’s market service: DDM submission stays with that platform
Time to live Seven weeks in their published implementation case study 2 to 6 weeks
The decision

Which one do you need?

Choose VIPR

When Lloyd’s direct reporting is mandatory, or when you want the whole delegated authority stack from one vendor: coverholder onboarding, portal, bordereaux, analytics and warehouse together.

Choose Brisc

When partner files arrive in layouts no rules library anticipated, when you need the bordereau produced as well as checked, and when the premium reported has to be matched to money in the bank with evidence an auditor can follow. See the Bordereaux Analyst.

Run both

Some books do. VIPR carries the Lloyd’s-facing reporting; Brisc takes the non-Bureau programs, the partner files that never fit a template, and the reconciliation to cash.

Comparing reconciliation platforms instead? Brisc vs AutoRek →

Common questions

Brisc vs VIPR, answered

What is the difference between Brisc and VIPR?

VIPR is a delegated authority platform: six products spanning coverholder onboarding, a submission portal, bordereaux management in Intrali, analytics and a data warehouse, established in the Lloyd’s and London market. Brisc is an AI-native bordereaux engine that also closes the cash loop. Both ingest and validate bordereaux. Brisc also generates the bordereau back out in the format the receiving party requires, and reconciles the reported premium to the money that actually arrived.

Does Brisc generate bordereaux?

Yes, in both directions. The Bordereaux Analyst reads source data in whatever form it arrives, a partner file, a PAS extract, or a feed straight from your data warehouse, normalises it to one schema, and generates the bordereau in the format the receiving party requires, whether that is a carrier template or a syndicate layout. After cash is applied it generates the premium bordereau you report up to capacity from validated line items. Brisc reads bordereaux and writes them.

Do we need a standardised bordereau before Brisc can work?

No. That is the work, not the prerequisite. The Analyst takes the layout each partner actually sends, maps it once with your operations team, and reuses that mapping every month. This is the core method difference: Brisc adapts to the data your partners send, rather than requiring your partners’ data to conform to a template first.

Is Brisc a replacement for VIPR?

Rarely a like-for-like swap, because the products are shaped differently. VIPR sells the whole delegated authority stack; Brisc is the bordereaux and cash layer, and your systems of record stay where they are. Where Lloyd’s direct reporting is mandatory, VIPR is the right tool for that reporting. Where the problem is partner files that do not fit a rules library, and premium that has to be proved against the bank, Brisc is.

Does VIPR reconcile bordereaux to cash?

VIPR describes Intrali as validating, transforming and aggregating risk, premium and claims data into a single, trusted data model. That is the bordereaux data layer: the file is checked and standardised. Matching the premium on that file to the money that arrived in the bank is a separate job, and it is the job the Brisc Reconciliation Analyst does. VIPR stops at a trusted data set; Brisc carries it through to a trusted cash position.

Is VIPR a competitor or a partner of Brisc?

Both, depending on the job. On bordereaux validation the two overlap and a buyer will compare them. On cash reconciliation they do not overlap: a book that already runs VIPR has a clean file, and Brisc matches that file to the bank. Brisc reads VIPR output the way it reads any other standardised bordereau.

Is Brisc’s matching AI?

The matching is deterministic, rule-based and explainable. AI reads the documents as they arrive and argues the borderline cases; it never decides a match. Every match names the rule that made it, and every extracted value carries a reasoning paragraph naming the source document and how it was read.

How accurate is Brisc, and how long until it is live?

97%+ matching accuracy at steady state. Expect 80% of records matched on day one, climbing to 92 to 95% by about 90 days as the rule base absorbs your book. Live in 2 to 6 weeks.

Bring your own bordereau. Watch it balance.

30 minutes, no slide deck. We run your real bordereau and a real bank statement. Your book is specific; the walkthrough should be too.

Book the walkthrough

Not ready for a call? Get the Decoding AI guide →