Brisc vs AutoRek

Brisc vs AutoRek: the controls platform, or the insurance Analyst.

AutoRek reconciles the finance function across four industries. Brisc does one job in one industry: match insurance cash to the policies, binders and claims it belongs to, with evidence on every row.

Different postures

A platform you configure, or an Analyst that reads your documents.

AutoRek

Financial data automation and controls

An enterprise reconciliation and controls platform with an insurance vertical alongside banking, payments and investment management. Its centre of gravity is the finance function: controls, client money, regulatory reporting.

Brisc

Insurance-native AI Analysts

Built only for insurance. The Reconciliation Analyst arrives already reading bordereaux, broker and cedant statements and Lloyd’s market formats. Its centre of gravity is the ops team that owns the number.

Where each stops

AutoRek is built for the finance function’s controls. Brisc is built for the insurance book.

AutoRek is built for

Financial data automation and controls across four industries, with insurance one of them. Its published insurance work is on the broker and MGA side: bordereau and bank payment reconciliation, insurance broker accounting, premium credit control and CASS 5 client-money automation, announced with Ardonagh, Flock and Superscript. It stops at the finance function: a controls platform configured per implementation, run by the team that owns the regulatory return.

Brisc is built for

The party that carries the risk. Brisc reads the bordereau, the broker statement and the cedant statement as they arrive, validates the file against the binder or treaty, matches each receipt to the policy, binder, layer or treaty it settles, and posts the result to your policy administration system or ledger with the evidence attached. It stops short of being a regulatory-reporting suite: the evidence trail is exportable, and the return is built from it in your own systems.

AutoRek facts from autorek.com/insurance and its announced customer work with Ardonagh (Insurance Business), Flock (Financial IT) and Superscript (Financial IT), read 20 October 2026. How the layers fit together: bordereaux management, who does what. Both products touch cash-to-bordereaux reconciliation (layer E); AutoRek also covers the finance and controls layer (C).

Side by side

Where the scopes differ.

 AutoRekBrisc
Layer Finance controls and reconciliation, with regulatory reporting on top Bordereaux validation and cash-to-bordereaux reconciliation, posted back to your system of record
Built for Financial controls across banking, payments, investment management and insurance Insurance only: MGAs, carriers, reinsurers, mutuals
Reads natively Financial data feeds, configured per implementation Bordereaux, broker statements, cedant statements, bank statements, Lloyd’s market formats
Outputs Reconciled positions, controls evidence and regulatory returns for the finance function Matched and exception rows with evidence, remit-ready outputs per capacity provider, the premium bordereau up to capacity, and postings to your PAS or ledger
Deployment shape Enterprise platform, scoped and configured per implementation SaaS on Azure, one dedicated tenant per customer
Regulatory reporting A core capability, including CASS client-money reporting Not a reporting suite: evidence on every match, full audit trail exportable
How matching works Configurable rules-based automation Deterministic rules; AI reads the documents and argues borderline cases, never decides a match
Time to live Scoped per implementation 2–6 weeks; day one needs no PAS integration
Who runs it The finance and controls function The team that owns the number: credit control, bordereaux, claims ops
The decision

Which one do you need?

Choose AutoRek

When the requirement is group-wide financial controls and regulatory reporting, CASS client-money obligations at the centre, one controls platform across a large finance function.

Choose Brisc

When the job is insurance cash: premium in, claims out, bordereaux in between. Cash application with evidence an auditor can follow, live inside a quarter.

Test it honestly

Run a real month through each and compare the match rate, the exceptions, and the evidence behind every row. We will put our output next to anyone’s.

Comparing bordereaux platforms instead? Brisc vs VIPR →

Common questions

Brisc vs AutoRek, answered

What is the difference between Brisc and AutoRek?

AutoRek is a financial data automation and controls platform serving banking, payments, investment management and insurance. Brisc is insurance-native only: AI Analysts that read bordereaux, broker statements and cedant statements, and match insurance cash to the policies, binders and claims it belongs to, with evidence on every row.

Does Brisc do CASS client-money reporting?

Brisc isn’t a regulatory-reporting suite. What it gives your compliance process is the substance: every match carries its evidence, and the full audit trail is exportable, so client-money and CASS reviews work from reconciled, evidenced output instead of spreadsheet reconstruction.

Can Brisc replace AutoRek?

If the requirement is insurance cash reconciliation, premium in and claims out, run the two side by side on a real month and compare the evidence. If the requirement is group-wide financial controls across more than insurance, the scopes differ and the comparison isn’t like-for-like.

Does AutoRek reconcile bordereaux to bank payments?

Yes, on the broker and MGA side. AutoRek’s published insurance customer announcements describe bordereau and bank payment reconciliation and CASS 5 client-money automation for UK brokers and MGAs. Brisc does the same reconciliation from the other seat: for the carrier, MGA or reinsurer that receives the bordereau and is owed the money on it, with the Analyst reading the file as sent and posting the result to your policy administration system.

Which side of the market is each built for?

AutoRek is built for the finance and controls function, across banking, payments, investment management and insurance, with its insurance references on the broker and MGA side. Brisc is built only for insurance and for the party carrying the risk: carriers, MGAs, reinsurers and mutuals, where the job is proving reported premium and claims against cash, treaty by treaty and binder by binder.

Is Brisc’s matching AI?

The matching is deterministic, rule-based and explainable. AI reads the documents as they arrive and argues the borderline cases; it never decides a match. Every match names the rule that made it.

How accurate is Brisc, and how long until it is live?

97%+ matching accuracy at steady state. Expect 80% of records matched on day one, climbing to 92 to 95% by about 90 days, roughly one row in twenty left for human judgment. Live in 2 to 6 weeks, and day one needs no PAS integration.

Bring your own bank statement. Watch it balance.

30 minutes, no slide deck. Tell us where the volume hurts and we show you the Analyst on it. Bring a bordereau, statement or submission if you have one; you don’t need to.

Book the walkthrough

Not ready for a call? Get the Cash Ops benchmarks →